> Anthony Hopkins Or Mads Mikkelsen?

Anthony Hopkins Or Mads Mikkelsen?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
In the end, Hopkins will always be the best Lecter, or even the best villain, of all time. He is extremely creepy and somehow makes you like a serial killer (which the only other place i've seen that happen for me is in Dexter or the Hannibal TV show)

But Mikkelson also does a very good job at playing Hannibal Lecter. He also plays him in a very different way. While in the films, Hopkins plays him in a way that makes you feel as if Hannibal is purposely trying to creep everyone out, Mikkelson plays him in a way that makes Hannibal seem as if he is trying his best to look completely natural and likeable. He hides the darkness inside him from everyone.

i love both portrayals of Lecter, but Hopkins will always be my favorite

Well Hopkins will always be the most memorable Hannibal Lecter, he was just brilliant. But I must say that Mads did a really good job in this new tv show. You can't really compare these two, they both have different portrayal of the character, both bring something special and unique and you can't say that one is better than the other, but then you can always have your opinion.

Hopkins, of course! He's absolutely brilliant!

I watched a few episodes of Hannibal, but I believe that Hopkins did the best.

Hopkins

Tony! Tony all the way!

Who Plays Hannibal Lecter better or more scary?

Hopkins in Silence Of The Lambs (1991), Hannibal (2001) and Red Dragon (2002)

or

Mads Mikkelsen in the Hannibal 2013 tv series?

See I love Anthony Hopkins both as Hannibal and in other films and I feel I am being unfair seeing as I haven't seen the new series but If I did I jjust know Hopkins will still be the best