the wierd little engine in a picture of the pentagon rubble
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/con... so airline jet engines are knee high????
the finding of a passport of a terrorist that survived the blast (the only passport found)
the fact theres no pictures of what hit the pentagon
the cover up of the parts removed from the pentagon
the fibre glass parts of the pentagon
the hole punched through steel reinforced concret in the pentagon
the office hit was the office auditing the 2.3 trillion lost in defence
this picture of bush
http://zonealarm.claro-search.com/imager...
this video of bush cursing conspiracy theorists
9/11 has been studied in enormous detail by people with a vested interest in attacking the US government and even they haven't been able to find any evidence that it was orchestrated by the government. The US government has never needed a reason to start imperialist wars, it just goes and does it whenever it feels like it. There are some questions to be answered about why Dubya's Saudi mates were flown out of the country so fast after the attack, but that's probably just because his family's business contacts with Saudis are dodgy, not directly linked to terrorism.
The answerer who says that terrorists are 'ghetto' and do not have the resources to stage such an attack is completely wrong. They are confusing Afghan peasants with highly educated engineers etc lavishly funded by Bin Laden. And actually, the only expensive bit was the pilot training, it doesn't really cost much to hijack and crash a plane. An academic called Ibrahim Warde has studied the finances of terrorism in detail and argues that the public greatly over-estimates the cost of terrorist attacks. He reckons that the 7 July London tube bombings cost about ￡500 - yes that's five hundred. There is very little relation between the devastation caused by an attack and the resources needed to stage it.
Yes. It is a terrorist attack by the government. It is so blatantly obvious of what the United States did after 9/11.
There is 100% no way the WTC buildings collapsed because of jet fuel. It's impossible for it to burn hot enough to melt the beams. Plus, there is now evidence , real legitimate I might add, that a specific high-volatility breed of thermite compound, existed either a.) within the building prior to the attack or b.) within the planes.
So no, I don't think it was a terrorist attack, because it would be single most intelligent and perfectly executed terrorist attack in the history of... ever. Terrorists are ghetto, even their bombs in their own country are jerry-rigged.
It was a terrorist attack. The evidence for that is overwhelming.
People can and should question our motives for going into the most recent wars and the political decision making process that went into that. But to tack on all this mae-up crap about controlled demolitions and inside jobs that is clear and obvious nonsense just makes those legitimate concerns look like paranoid rants.
Yes
It is a terrorist attack. Don't believe all the conspiracy theories you hear out there.
It was hit by hijacked commercial airliners and not US military planes.
Yes. No intelligent person holds the same beliefs as you.
Yes, terrorist attack.
all the participants were Middle East students so I suppose it must have been.Whatever or who ever was responsible will go down in history as a Terrorist.
I think there are many things in this world that no one will ever find out-- sad isn't it
Yes! The planes where us military not even airliners.
no, it was these friendly leprechauns who were flying over to america but lost control of the plane and flew into the twin towers, a field and the pentagon..legit?
