Now it could be argued, as you have done, that other acts of terrorism and related violence have been perpetrated by non-Muslims, many of them Christian. The fact is though that 1) almost none of them had as their driving reasoning for their acts of violence their religious faith, and 2) there is no movement, sects or other groups within the Christian faith anywhere in the world that are calling for, much less perpetrating acts of violence in the name of their religion or because their they claim their religion teaches or endorses such acts.
Other Muslims have been the greatest victims of extremist Muslim acts of violence by far. Why? The overriding reasoning for the acceptance of these acts by many Muslims including those that perpetrated them is because of religious differences. Otherwise known as religious intolerance. They're not 'real Muslims' they would argue.
Columbine was NOT religiously motivated. Show me one bit of evidence to prove otherwise. You can find plenty of lists online of countless acts of violence (bombing, suicide attacks, etc) perpetrated by and in the name of some extremist Islamic ideology.
The only muslims who support such actions are those of which the states have been inflicting on for the past 20 years. People forget that the states have impacted so many peoples lives - the drone strikes everyday in Afghanastan to the military bases in Iraq to the Navy fleet off the coast of Iran, suppressing the **** of of that country. If you were a regular day to day citizen, in any of those countries, you would probably hate the **** out of the states too.
Oh and if it was White american christians who flew those planes into the towers, the term "Terrorism" would most likely not exist. and the sheep of America
(not all of americans, just the ones who feed into all the B.S) would have no reason to hate Islam.
A good comparison is Catholic terrorism in Britain over many years. The IRA, a catholic organisation, used to leave bombs around England and commit other acts of terrorism, but the British government never criticised catholics. Yet after 9/11 the american news media kept showing moslems praying and the towers going down, as if all moslems were responsible. If the British tv stations had shown catholics praying, along with bombs going off in Britain, people would have thought it was ridiculous.
Unfortunatelly people are ignorrant and stupid and don't like to face the ugly truth. Take for instance that white kid that shot the senator lady in the head in Arizona don't remember the names don't care. The kid was declared mentally disabled and is now in a mental facility now if it was a minority lets say a Mexican person you sure as hell know he's gonna get the electric chair that's how f*cking retarded society is.
You have a picture of the white Jesus as your avitar. Didnt the Romans and Jewish leaders consider him a terrorist of sorts... Look how that turned out.
Your full of it, The Branch Davidians, Randy Weaver and other fringe militia types who were 99% white were all dealt with and crushed in past 20 years.
As for your racist comments against white people-you are just typical troll
Like Oklahoma City?
If it it had been Christians.We would have soon forgot. Anyway in that case they would have flown onto some middle eastern tower.
If those hijackers weren't Muslim Arabs but instead were Christian extremist white men that wanted to fly planes into a building that carry's many tourists, would we be less hateful towards Muslims or Arabs in general? Actually when this happened, initially I thought they Christian white men that hated minorities and tourists How would we react towards white men if they were responsible for the terrorist attacks back in 9/11/2001.
Something similiar like this happened in Columbine High school in 1999 when 2 white teenage boys planned a terrorist attack on a school.
