It wouldn't sound like rubbish if you knew what you were talking about. The "Ground Zero Mosque" as it has been inappropriately called for years is not in a new building. It is an old renovated Burlington Coat Factory store and we have known since the morning of 9/11/2001 that the building was damaged by flying debris that morning. All of that has been very widely reported in the press over the years. You could have Googled it yourself in mere seconds.
Here is what that "new" building looks like:
http://commonsenseatheism.com/wp-content...
That a good sized chunk of debris is still in the building is a bit of a surprise but then, given it was empty for many years and then the issues they have had developing the site over the last decade due to politcs and religious bigotry, maybe not.
BTW - There was no "planes were vaporized" story. Some substantial pieces of both flight 11 and 175 were recovered.
If "rubbish" is another word for plane debris, then yes. The buildings existed prior to 9/11. Planes will fragment highly in high speed impacts. It is not a new phenomenon.
Edit - MSN's article states that the part was found on the property for the proposed mosque, meaning it hasn't even been built yet.
The world trade center was destroyed by aliens from outer space. They left behind a jet part to confuse the issue. It worked. People with limited intelligence are quite confused. By the way Elvis was flying the UFO.
http://m.smh.com.au/world/landing-gear-from-911-plane-found-20130427-2ikua.html
Sounds like rubbish. And if the mosque wasnt built until after 9/11, how was the part wedged between the buildings? A BS story to combat their "planes were vapourised" story.
