Flight 93 was not shot down, the passenger fought for control, the plan crashed.
The plane was going down so fast that there were very few pieces.
If the plane was shot down, there would of been more pieces and bodies.
There were fighter jet on the way with orders to shot the plane, that is because 3 other planes were used as bombs that killed more people that was on the plane.
If it was flight 93 that crashed in that field, how come there were NO bodies were ever found or recovered? 9-11 was a government set up, just like Pearl Harbor (WWII), attack in the gulf of Tonken (viet nam). This is all done to whip up the population into an emotional frenzy, to do the bidding of the wealthy secret society's "hidden power grabbing agenda". Right now we have 50,000 troops in Afghanistan protecting the poppy fields.On 9-11, why did the 3rd building come crashing down at all? They say no black boxes were recovered. That's a flat out lie, by the gov't we're supposed to trust. Heaven help us all.
If the plane had been shot down you wouldn't hear three 'loud bangs I doubt if anyone would have time to reach for their phone if it had been shot down, and how can anyone predict what would of happened if Flight 93 had not left 41 minutes late.
Nobody shot down Flight 93.
A Canadian Air Force General was in command of NORAD on 9\11.
He's got no reason to lie, let alone be part of some retarded US government conspiracy theory.
But thanks for the laugh.
And since your parents obviously never told you this:
Jut like Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny, 9/11 conspiracies aren't real.
Sorry to burst your bubble but that's life here in the real world where sane people live.
Susan McElwain was a witness and saw a small white drone just above her car.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVrwU-snF...
No sound like Flight 175 and unlike Flight 11
Its not for us to reason why,especially not this long ago. The asker is seeking opinion while we deal only in facts and knowledge.
I am happy with what was done on that terrible day. If it was shot down then there must have been a reason not privy to us.
Here's the thing....if it was shot down, rather than crashed, so what? if it was hijacked and flying toward Washington to hit another target then the right play IS to shoot it down.
Why lie about it? Well one good reason I can think of is that means there is a young pilot out there that was forced, by duty, to shoot down an airliner full of civilians. So you say it crashed to spare the pilot the public albatross of being "the guy who shot 93 down". Same principle behind putting a blank in one of the guns in a firing squad.
It wasn't shot down and the passengers never had control of the aircraft.
It was shot down. All this talk about how the passengers banded together is a load of bull. It was made up to help the country unite and heal.
It all fits in with the mantra the government was spewing at the time about how "united we stand divided we fall".
Blah blah blah
Why was Flight 93 shot down despite the fact that those who ordered this almost certainly knew that the passengers had taken control, and that it was the one plane that could potentially have landed safely? And why was it the only plane that was shot down- no real attempt was made to try to attack the other three which did hit their targets? The supposed hijackers did not have guns, so what made the three 'loud bangs' reported by many passengers on phone calls just before the plane crashed, other than the sound of it being shot down? It also explains why debris was scattered over such a large area.
Also, just another question, what do you think would have happened if Flight 93 had not left 41 minutes late? The passengers would not have learnt their flight was on a suicide mission so wouldn't have attempted to take on the hijackers.
Ahh yet another conspiracy theory purporting to be a question of fact look it up or is everyone lying about it and only you know the facts ?
If it was shot down we must have thought that was the best course of action.
The evidence for this is?
Need this to answer this question but the situation on the day should give you a clue if it ever was so.
They were all shot down, you can't see that? Hmm, you must be with the KGB. Only the KGB thinks that some of the crashes were real.
It's because of the Mexican drug lords of course, you know that bunky.
It wasn't' shot down it crashed
"Almost certainly knew" doesn't cut the mustard as a "fact"!
"Almost certainly knew" is not a credible argument.
